Advantages

Native PostgreSQL installation gives you the best performance and the closest thing to a production Linux environment on macOS. You get full control over configuration, service management, and when PostgreSQL starts. Homebrew makes installation clean, and launchd handles service management reliably. You can run multiple PostgreSQL versions simultaneously on different ports, and you have direct access to all PostgreSQL files and configuration. This is the most flexible option for serious local development.

Disadvantages

Native installation requires more setup and management than Postgres.app or Docker. You’re responsible for starting and stopping the service, configuring auto-start, and managing system-level settings. Updates require manual intervention, and you need to understand launchd and Homebrew service management. It’s easier to accidentally break things or create conflicts with other PostgreSQL installations. For developers who want simplicity, Postgres.app is easier. For those who want isolation and reproducibility, Docker might be better.

Sometimes you want PostgreSQL installed directly on your Mac. No containers, no apps. Just PostgreSQL running as a system service. This gives you the most control, the best performance, and the closest thing to a production Linux environment you’ll get on macOS.

The trade-off is you’re managing a system service. But if you know what you’re doing, it’s straightforward. Homebrew makes the installation painless, and macOS’s launchd handles the service management. You get full control over when it starts, how it’s configured, and what versions you’re running.

This is the complete guide to installing PostgreSQL natively on macOS, configuring it properly, managing the service, and setting up an initial development database named interlinedlist.

Continue reading “A Complete Native PostgreSQL Setup on macOS: Homebrew and Launchd” →

Advantages

Docker gives you production parity and complete isolation. You can match exact PostgreSQL versions, run multiple instances simultaneously on different ports, and tear everything down with a single command. Docker Compose makes it easy to version control your database configuration and share it with your team. If you’re already using Docker for other services, PostgreSQL fits right into your existing workflow. Containers are predictable, reproducible, and never pollute your system with leftover installs.

Disadvantages

Docker adds overhead and complexity compared to Postgres.app or native installation. You need Docker Desktop running, which consumes system resources. Containers can be slower than native installations, and you’ll need to manage volumes for data persistence. If you’re not already using Docker, this adds another tool to your stack. For simple single-database development, Postgres.app might be faster and easier.

Sometimes you need more than Postgres.app. Maybe you’re matching production versions exactly, running multiple PostgreSQL instances, or you want complete isolation between projects. Docker gives you that control without polluting your system with multiple PostgreSQL installs.

Docker-based PostgreSQL setups are predictable, reproducible, and easy to tear down. You get production parity without the headaches of managing multiple versions on your Mac. If you’re already using Docker for other services, this fits right into your workflow.

This is the short guide to getting PostgreSQL running in Docker, configured, and ready for an initial development database named interlinedlist.

Continue reading “A Clean, Production-Parity Way to Run PostgreSQL on macOS: Docker” →

Advantages

Postgres.app is the simplest PostgreSQL setup for macOS. It’s self-contained, requires no system configuration, and runs as a regular application. You get a working PostgreSQL server in minutes without touching the command line or managing system services. Everything stays in one place, making it easy to find your databases and configuration. It’s perfect for developers who want PostgreSQL available without the overhead of Docker or native system service management.

Disadvantages

Postgres.app doesn’t give you production parity or version control like Docker does. You can’t easily run multiple PostgreSQL versions simultaneously, and it’s harder to match exact production environments. It also requires manual management of when the server runs, and you’ll need to remember to start it if you don’t configure auto-start. For teams that need reproducible environments or multiple PostgreSQL versions, Docker or native installation might be better choices.

Local PostgreSQL setups get messy fast if you let them. Multiple versions, stray installers, and leftover data directories can leave you wondering which psql binary you’re even using. On macOS, the cleanest and least painful path is Postgres.app. It’s self-contained, predictable, and never leaves you guessing where your database went.

I’ve cycled through Homebrew installs, Docker setups, and enough legacy PostgreSQL installers to know when something is worth keeping around. Postgres.app is that option.

This is the short guide to getting it installed, configured, and ready for an initial development database named interlinedlist.

Continue reading “A Clean, No-Nonsense Way to Install PostgreSQL on macOS: Postgres.app” →